|
Back to Healthcare Home Page
FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE
New Jersey Supreme Court Ruling
Enables NJDHSS
to Prevent Gap in Ongoing Angioplasty Project
Marlton, NJ – November 29, 2007
– The New Jersey Supreme Court today issued a ruling that will allow
nine New Jersey hospitals to continue uninterrupted participation in
an important elective angioplasty demonstration project by extending
the time within which the state’s Department of Health and Senior
Services must promulgate revised regulations, and issue new
certificates of need and licenses. The
multi-state project is being conducted by Johns Hopkins, and is
designed to compare outcomes of patients treated with elective
angioplasty at hospitals with cardiac surgery on-site to hospitals
that have off-site cardiac surgery back-up.
Virtua
Health filed a motion on September 10 requesting that the Court
extend the deadline mandated by the Court’s May 31, 2007 ruling in
order to provide the state’s Department of Health and Senior
Services the time necessary to comply. Today’s court ruling grants
Virtua’s motion.
The Court’s May 31 order required the
Department of Health and Senior Services to revise its existing
regulations to eliminate conflicts in the rules that govern the
project. The Court provided that the nine participating hospitals
could continue performing elective angioplasty for six months until
new regulations and licenses were in place.
In its September 10 motion, Virtua
contended that the November 30 deadline did not provide sufficient
time for NJDHSS to complete the processes required to allow the
project to continue without interruption. Today’s ruling
emphasizes that the Court’s prior ruling was concerned with the
administrative process and that the Court believed the study itself
was safe and should continue.
“We have always believed that the
Court intended to allow the Department to move forward so that the
elective angioplasty demonstration project could continue
uninterrupted,” said Richard P. Miller, President and CEO, Virtua
Health. “This case was never about patient safety. If it
were, the Court would never have allowed the study to continue.”
Commissioner of Health and Senior
Services Fred Jacobs, M.D., J.D., approved the participation of the
nine New Jersey hospitals in the elective angioplasty demonstration
project on October 31, 2005. All of those hospitals have had their
programs licensed and in operation for a year or more. “We commend
Commissioner Jacobs for his unwavering support for New Jersey’s
participation in this important multi-state study,” added Miller.
Because Virtua was the only one of the
nine participating hospitals that was a party to the Supreme Court
proceeding, Virtua’s counsel, Philip Lebowitz and Erin Duffy of
Duane Morris LLP, filed the motion on behalf of all nine hospitals.
Three South Jersey hospitals – Cooper
University Hospital, Lourdes Medical Center, and Deborah Hospital –
appealed the Commissioner’s approval in an attempt to stop the
demonstration project. Those three hospitals took their appeal all
the way to the New Jersey Supreme Court.
According to the Department of Health
and Senior Services, participation in the demonstration project is
important so that the state can best determine how to respond to the
public interest in expanding the availability of elective
angioplasty, which is increasingly the preferred treatment over
heart by-pass surgery.
In response to the Court’s order, the
Department developed the required new regulations. On November 15,
the HCAB voted to approve the revised regulations for final
adoption, and the revised regulations will become effective upon
publication in the New Jersey Register on December 17, 2007.
Because of the Court’s November 30
deadline, this would have resulted in a period of at least 17 days
during which participating hospitals would be precluded from
performing elective angioplasty procedures or continuing to treat
patients who underwent the procedure at their hospitals previously.
In addition, the Court ruled that the Department must reissue new
certificates of need and licenses after the regulations are adopted,
a process which could require an additional six months, thereby
lengthening a potential gap in the project.
Through today’s ruling, the Court
modified its deadline to enable the Department of Health and Senior
Services to develop the necessary regulations and allow for the
continuation of existing licenses until the Department can reissue
new licenses.
New Jersey is responsible for more
than 30 percent of the demonstration project’s volume, making the
state’s ongoing participation vital to the study’s integrity and
timely completion.
The hospitals participating in the
demonstration project are: Bayonne Medical Center, Holy Name
Hospital, Monmouth Medical Center, Muhlenberg Regional Medical
Center, Raritan Bay Medical Center, Robert Wood Johnson University
Hospital – Hamilton, Somerset Medical Center, Trinitas Hospital and
Virtua West Jersey Hospital Marlton. All eight of the other
participating hospitals have expressed support for Virtua in filing
its motion.
Back to Healthcare Home Page
|